XYRONIX Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process

1. In June 2023, XYRONIX, which boasts a geothermal power generation method known as the Closed-Cycle Heat Exchange Geothermal Power Generation System with a regenerative binary engine (the CHEGP system) capable of generating power at a level ranging from gigawatts to terawatts per unit, successfully conducted research on the AERI synthetic fuel chemical process. This process utilizes infinite and renewable energy (electricity) generated by the CHEGP system and carbon dioxide (CO2) collected from the atmosphere to artificially synthesize and produce synthetic fuels such as methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6), propane (C3H8), butane (C4H10), ethanol (C2H5OH), methanol (CH3OH), and more.

2. Furthermore, we have successfully chemically synthesized the aforementioned synthetic fuels to artificially produce e-methane, the primary component of city gas.

3. Additionally, we achieved success in the Procel research, which involves using the synthetic methane generated artificially, along with the synthetic ethane and propane also produced artificially, to create synthetic natural gas, a type of fossil fuel. We have also succeeded in liquefying this artificially synthesized natural gas, creating artificial liquefied natural gas (LPG).

4. The artificial synthetic fuel generation technology achieved by AERI has strategic implications in various fields:

a. Domestication of Sustainable Energy: This technology promotes investment and development in renewable energy, reducing the need for importing and using crude oil and LPG (fossil fuels) from current oil-producing and LPG-producing countries. Instead, we can abundantly use domestically produced artificial synthetic fuels as substitutes for gasoline and imported LNG.

b. In-house Production and Domestication of Strategic Export Resources: With domestically produced artificial synthetic fuels, including methane, ethane, propane, butane, ethanol, methanol, and LPG, we can export these resources to foreign countries using LPG tankers, among other means. Consequently, our country can transition from being an energy-importing nation to an energy-exporting nation, achieving a dramatic transformation and evolution.

c. Total Abolition of Thermal and Nuclear Power Generation: Leveraging the geothermal energy source, which is an infinitely and cost-effectively produced clean energy source, utilizing the CHEGP System, we can completely phase out current thermal power generation, reducing carbon dioxide emissions from power generation to zero.

d. Realization of Sustainable Agriculture: Improvements in agricultural practices, combined with access to clean water sources free of nuclear contamination, enable the stable supply of natural agricultural products, reducing the reliance on genetically modified crops and minimizing environmental impact.

e. Adaptation to Climate Change: By capturing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and using it as a raw material for artificial synthetic fuels such as LPG, we can provide a fundamental solution to climate change and extreme weather conditions caused primarily by increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. This includes addressing issues like abnormal high temperatures, rising sea levels, larger hurricanes, and droughts or floods.

f. LPG (Natural Gas) Vehicle Strategy: We can replace existing gasoline vehicles with LPG (natural gas) vehicles, seamlessly transitioning gasoline stations into LPG stations. Refueling LPG is as convenient as refueling gasoline, eliminating the major drawback of electric vehicle adoption, which requires longer charging times and charging infrastructure.

g. Circulatory Carbon Dioxide Recovery: Although LPG vehicles emit carbon dioxide gas in their exhaust, our AERI synthetic fuel chemical process recovers this carbon dioxide and uses it as a raw material for synthetic fuels like LPG, enabling the circulatory recovery and reduction of carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere.

h. Rising as an Advanced Nation in Environmental Protection: Environmental issues such as global warming and pollution have the potential to profoundly affect humanity in the future. Protecting the environment is crucial for ensuring long-term sustainability and securing a better future for our planet.

i. Rising as a Pioneer of Sustainable Economic Models: Our country can transform into a nation pursuing a sustainable economic model that balances environmental protection and economic growth by organically combining the CHEGP System and AERI synthetic fuel chemical process.

j. Promoting Green Economy: Amidst the inability to halt environmental degradation in current capitalist nations, our country can rise as a leader in advanced green economies and green industries, promoting environmentally friendly initiatives. This will attract increased foreign investments in areas such as renewable energy, environmental technology, and eco-friendly products and services.

k. Attaining a Leading Role in International Cooperation: Environmental issues are inherently international, and solutions cannot be achieved by a single nation alone. By exporting our combined technology of the CHEGP System and AERI synthetic fuel chemical process to other countries, we can pioneer methods of incorporating environmental protection within capitalism, proposing practical solutions that balance economics and the environment, ultimately becoming international winners in the realm of green economy and green industry.

This paper elucidates the technical and economic challenges and issues associated with various modes of transportation when importing liquid hydrogen from overseas to Japan.

 

1. Liquid Hydrogen Tankers: a. Technical Challenges and Issues: - Requirements for Insulation and Cooling Technology: Liquid hydrogen is liquefied at extremely low temperatures, necessitating advanced insulation and cooling technologies. Efficient selection of insulation materials and cooling systems is imperative. - Necessity of Safety Measures: Liquid hydrogen poses a high explosion risk, making safety measures on board vessels paramount. The development of technologies and devices to minimize leakage and fire risks is essential. b. Economic Challenges and Issues: - Construction and Operating Costs: The construction and operation of liquid hydrogen tankers incur high costs, particularly due to the implementation of insulation and cooling technologies and safety measures. - Development of Filling and Discharging Facilities: Facilities for filling and discharging liquid hydrogen need to be established, adding to the overall cost considerations.

2. Specialized Liquid Gas Tank Containers: a. Technical Challenges and Issues: - Design of Insulation and Cooling Technology: The design of insulation and cooling technologies within containers for holding liquid hydrogen is crucial. Optimizing thermal insulation performance is essential. - Pressure and Temperature Management Inside Containers: Technologies are required to manage the pressure and temperature of liquid hydrogen within containers to ensure stable transportation. b. Economic Challenges and Issues: - Construction Costs and Maintenance of Cooling Technology: Construction costs for containers equipped with specialized insulation tanks and maintenance costs for cooling technologies are influential economic factors. - Flexibility and Cost of Transportation Methods: The flexibility to adapt to multiple transportation methods is economically crucial, allowing for the selection of transportation modes tailored to regional demand.

Taking all of these factors into consideration, the transportation of liquid hydrogen from overseas to Japan requires a balanced evaluation of technical challenges, economic costs, safety, sustainability, and cost-effectiveness. Various elements must be comprehensively assessed to optimize safety, sustainability, and cost efficiency.

3. Liquid Hydrogen Pipelines:

• Pipelines can be considered for long-distance transportation of liquid hydrogen.

• The design, construction, and maintenance of pipelines require advanced technology.

4. Retrofitting of Transport Ships and Container Ships:

• Existing vessels can be retrofitted to accommodate the transportation of liquid hydrogen.

• Specialized equipment must be installed within container ships for the containment of liquid hydrogen.

5. Air Transport:

• The use of dedicated aircraft equipped with advanced insulation facilities for transporting liquid hydrogen is also a possibility.

• Air transport offers rapid transportation capabilities but demands specialized aircraft designs and technology.

Each of these transportation methods considers various elements to efficiently and safely transport liquid hydrogen. The selection of a transportation mode will be determined based on factors such as transportation distance, safety, environmental impact, cost, and infrastructure availability.

6.Transportation of Liquid Hydrogen Using Organic Chemical Hydride Method:

A. The Organic Chemical Hydride Method and its Application to Liquid Hydrogen

a. The organic chemical hydride method is a process related to the generation, storage, transport, and release of hydrogen gas, utilizing organic compounds to handle hydrogen. This method finds various applications in the production and utilization of hydrogen energy. Below, we provide a detailed explanation of the organic chemical hydride method and its application to liquid hydrogen.

b. Basic Principles of the Organic Chemical Hydride Method:

1. Hydrogen Absorption: Organic chemical hydrides (typically organic boranes) absorb hydrogen gas. This reaction usually occurs at high temperatures, chemically binding hydrogen gas to the organic hydride, allowing for safe hydrogen storage.

2. Hydrogen Release: When hydrogen is needed, the organic hydride is processed, typically by heating or other methods, to release hydrogen gas again. This reverse reaction separates hydrogen gas from the organic hydride.

3. Safety and Ease of Handling: Organic chemical hydrides do not require high pressure or extremely low temperatures for handling hydrogen, enhancing both the safety and ease of hydrogen management.

B. Applications to Liquid Hydrogen:

1. Hydrogen Transportation: The organic chemical hydride method can be employed for transporting liquid hydrogen. It absorbs hydrogen as an organic hydride and can release it as hydrogen gas when needed, supplying liquid hydrogen at the required location, enabling remote supply of liquid hydrogen.

2. Liquid Hydrogen Storage: Hydrogen can be absorbed using the organic chemical hydride method and stored as liquid hydrogen. This allows for long-term storage of liquid hydrogen, which can be withdrawn as per demand.

3. Hydrogen Supply: It can be supplied for various applications that require liquid hydrogen, including fuel cell vehicles, rockets, industrial processes, and power generation, enhancing its utility in multiple hydrogen-related sectors.

4. Increased Energy Density: Using the organic chemical hydride method, the energy density of liquid hydrogen is improved, enabling the storage of large quantities of hydrogen within compact containers.

5. Enhanced Safety: Handling liquid hydrogen is safer, reducing risks associated with high pressures and low temperatures. Improved safety is crucial for the widespread adoption of hydrogen energy.

The organic chemical hydride method presents a promising approach for efficiently and safely handling liquid hydrogen, potentially playing a significant role in the development of hydrogen energy. However, further technological improvements and overcoming economic challenges are necessary.

C. Transportation of Liquid Hydrogen Using the Organic Chemical Hydride Method

The transportation of liquid hydrogen using the organic chemical hydride method is a technique for safely and efficiently conveying and storing liquid hydrogen while avoiding the handling of hydrogen gas at high pressures and extremely low temperatures, thereby enhancing safety. Below, we provide a detailed description of the process for transporting liquid hydrogen using the organic chemical hydride method.

1. Selection of Chemical Hydride: Firstly, choose an appropriate organic chemical hydride for transporting liquid hydrogen. Organic chemical hydrides are organic compounds capable of absorbing and releasing hydrogen. Common examples include ammonia borane, cyclohexane borane, and diborane.

2. Hydrogen Absorption: Place the selected organic chemical hydride near the liquid hydrogen to absorb hydrogen gas. This process typically occurs under low-temperature and high-pressure conditions. When hydrogen is absorbed into the chemical hydride, it is retained stably.

3. Hydrogen Transportation: During the transportation of liquid hydrogen, the reaction between the chemical hydride and hydrogen absorption reverses, releasing hydrogen gas. As a result, hydrogen gas is extracted as liquid hydrogen accumulates inside the transportation container. This process is gradual and adjustable to secure the required amount of liquid hydrogen.

4. Safety and Transport: Containers for transporting liquid hydrogen are insulated and equipped with suitable cooling systems to maintain liquid hydrogen at low temperatures. Additionally, to ensure safety, these containers control pressure and include adequate ventilation devices and safety valves, preventing hydrogen gas leaks during transport.

5. Handling at the Destination: Upon reaching the destination, supply the liquid hydrogen for its intended applications. During supply, reverse the reaction with the chemical hydride to extract and utilize hydrogen gas.

Transporting liquid hydrogen using the organic chemical hydride method simplifies its handling and enhances safety, especially for remote or specialized applications.

D. Advantages and Disadvantages of Transporting Liquid Hydrogen Using the Organic Chemical Hydride Method

Transporting liquid hydrogen using the organic chemical hydride method has several advantages and disadvantages. We detail each of them below.

 

a. Advantages:

1. Enhanced Safety: The organic chemical hydride method reduces the need to handle hydrogen gas at high pressures or extremely low temperatures, thus improving safety. Given the high-risk nature of handling liquid hydrogen, this method reduces the risk of accidents.

2. Transportation Benefits: Converting liquid hydrogen into chemical hydrides for transport simplifies handling and extends transport distances. This makes it possible to supply liquid hydrogen to remote areas.

3. Stability of Liquid Hydrogen: Organic chemical hydrides can securely hold hydrogen in a stable form. This allows for the long-term storage of liquid hydrogen, which can be withdrawn as needed.

4. Increased Energy Density: The chemical hydride method enables the storage of hydrogen in relatively compact containers, resulting in an improved energy density for liquid hydrogen.

b. Disadvantages:

1. Decreased Energy Efficiency: The chemical hydride method requires energy for hydrogen absorption and release, leading to energy losses. This can reduce overall energy efficiency.

2. Chemical Handling: Handling chemical hydrides requires care, especially when dealing with high pressures or low temperatures. Special equipment and materials may be needed, adding to the cost.

3. Recycling and Waste Management: Using chemical hydride methods necessitates recycling of used chemical hydrides and proper waste disposal, posing environmental challenges.

4. Reaction Rate Limitations: The reaction rate in the chemical hydride method can be slow, particularly in large-scale hydrogen supply systems. Equipment expansion may be required to ensure appropriate reaction rates.

Transporting liquid hydrogen using the organic chemical hydride method is highly beneficial for specific applications but presents challenges related to energy efficiency, equipment requirements, recycling, and reaction rates. Therefore, the suitability of this method should be assessed based on specific applications and requirements.

E. Challenges to Commercialize the Transportation of Liquid Hydrogen

Using the Organic Chemical Hydride Method Several challenges exist, both in terms of technology and economics, to commercialize the transportation of liquid hydrogen using the organic chemical hydride method. We detail these challenges below.

 

a. Technological Challenges:

1. Improved Reaction Rates: Enhancing reaction rates is crucial, as the organic chemical hydride method often exhibits slow reaction kinetics. Research into catalysts and optimal reaction conditions is necessary.

2. Increased Energy Efficiency: To reduce energy losses during hydrogen absorption and release, research should focus on developing technologies like efficient heat exchange systems and energy recovery devices.

3. Material Durability: Materials capable of withstanding high pressure and low-temperature conditions need to be developed to ensure safety during the use of the chemical hydride method.

4. Recycling and Waste Management: Developing methods for recycling used chemical hydrides and managing waste is essential to minimize environmental impact.

b. Economic Challenges:

1. Cost of Chemical Hydrides: Organic chemical hydrides can be expensive, affecting the overall economics of hydrogen transportation. Research into cost-effective production methods is needed.

2. Infrastructure Investment: Building and maintaining infrastructure for the chemical hydride method can be costly, particularly for large-scale transportation systems.

3. Energy Costs: The energy required for hydrogen absorption and release can contribute significantly to operational costs. Efforts to reduce energy consumption are vital.

4. Market Competition: The chemical hydride method competes with other hydrogen transportation methods, such as pipelines and cryogenic storage, which may be more economically attractive for certain applications.

To commercialize the transportation of liquid hydrogen using the organic chemical hydride method, addressing these technological and economic challenges is essential. Collaborative efforts between researchers, industry stakeholders, and government agencies can accelerate progress in this field.

 

F. Exploring the Viability of Implementing Liquid Hydrogen Transportation Using the Organic Chemical Hydride Method

 

This research delves into a comprehensive examination of the feasibility of practically implementing the organic chemical hydride method for the transportation of liquid hydrogen, taking into account both its technical and economic aspects.

a. Technical Perspectives:

1. Technological Maturation:

• The organic chemical hydride method has already found application in specific research experiments and boasts a well-established theoretical underpinning. Importantly, technological maturity is on an upward trajectory, with ongoing research endeavors focusing on elevating reaction rates and enhancing the durability of materials involved.

1. Efficiency Enhancement:

• Noteworthy strides in technology have led to remarkable improvements in energy efficiency. The development of catalysts and the optimization of reaction conditions have contributed to heightened efficiency in the processes of hydrogen absorption and release, ultimately resulting in significant reductions in energy losses.

1. Safety Measures:

• Concurrently, significant attention is being devoted to addressing safety concerns of a technical nature. Researchers are actively engaged in exploring materials capable of withstanding the rigors of high-pressure and low-temperature conditions, thereby significantly enhancing the safety protocols associated with the handling of liquid hydrogen.

1. Recycling and Environmental Responsibility:

• It is pivotal to underscore that proactive measures are underway with regard to the recycling of used organic chemical hydrides and the development of advanced waste management techniques. These initiatives are integral in ensuring minimal environmental impact.

b. Economic Perspectives:

1. Cost Reduction Initiatives:

• Harnessing the momentum of technological advancements and the potential offered by economies of scale, concerted efforts are being made to curtail the overall cost associated with the transportation of liquid hydrogen. The reduction of facility costs and the optimization of energy expenditure are recognized as pivotal factors in achieving economic viability.

1. Competitive Edge:

• The competitive landscape of the liquid hydrogen supply market is notably fierce. However, the organic chemical hydride method demonstrates significant potential to effectively compete with alternative supply methods. Particularly in remote geographical regions and specialized applications, its inherent safety and efficiency constitute substantial competitive advantages.

1. Sustainability Considerations:

• It is imperative to acknowledge the pivotal role played by liquid hydrogen transportation in the context of sustainable energy provision. The sustainability prospects of this method are poised to be significantly bolstered if it proves to be an environmentally conscientious solution.

1. Demand-Supply Synergy:

• As the demand for liquid hydrogen experiences continued growth, the organic chemical hydride method may emerge as an enabler of precise supply tailored to meet this burgeoning demand. Consequently, it holds the potential to play a pivotal role in preserving equilibrium within the market.

In summation, the implementation of the organic chemical hydride method for the transportation of liquid hydrogen is characterized by its ongoing technological evolution and the concurrent improvement in its economic viability. Against the backdrop of a mounting demand for sustainable energy solutions, this method emerges as a promising candidate for future practical implementation. Nevertheless, it is imperative to underscore that challenges persist, underscoring the indispensable need for continued research and development endeavors.

 

c. Conclusion: The organic chemical hydride method offers a promising approach for the safe and efficient transportation of liquid hydrogen. By leveraging organic compounds to absorb and release hydrogen gas, this method enhances the safety and feasibility of handling liquid hydrogen, making it suitable for a range of applications, including fuel cell vehicles, industrial processes, and power generation.

Currently, there have been efforts to introduce the methanation technology to create synthetic methane from hydrogen gas (H2) and carbon dioxide gas (CO2).

1. Overview of Methanation Technology

• Methanation technology involves the synthesis of "e-methane," a major component of city gas, by reacting hydrogen generated from renewable energy sources with carbon dioxide gas (CO2). Its primary aim is to contribute to deoxygenation through hydrogen utilization.

• The methanation technology sets a goal to incorporate 1% e-methane into city gas within approximately ten years. It envisions using existing infrastructure, such as gas manufacturing plants and refineries in port areas, as methanation facilities.

• By using carbon dioxide (CO2) in the process of synthesizing methane, methanation technology can offset the CO2 emissions resulting from burning methane. It also proposes utilizing renewable energy during water electrolysis for hydrogen (H2) production, further contributing to decarbonization.

2. Challenges and Solutions in Methanation Technology Methanation technology involves the production of synthetic methane gas (CH4) from hydrogen gas (H2) and carbon dioxide gas (CO2). While it holds potential for energy storage and the efficient use of renewable energy, several challenges need to be addressed:

Challenge 1: Hydrogen Supply and Generation Hydrogen is a core material in the methanation process, requiring efficient supply and generation due to its high-energy demand.

Solution:

1. Hydrogen Production from Renewable Energy Sources: Developing sustainable hydrogen supply sources, such as hydrogen production from solar or wind power through water electrolysis or from biogas, is essential.

2. High-Efficiency Hydrogen Manufacturing Processes: Research and implement high-efficiency hydrogen production processes, including high-temperature, high-pressure hydrogen production and electrolysis.

Challenge 2: Carbon Dioxide Collection and Supply Efficient collection and supply of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the methanation process, especially for large-scale supply and long-term storage, is challenging.

Solution:

1. Utilization of Carbon Capture Technology: Utilize carbon capture technology to recover and store CO2 from industrial processes and power plants.

2. Efficiency Enhancement in CO2 Supply: Optimize the entire CO2 supply chain, ensuring efficient flow from supply sources to the methanation process.

Challenge 3: Energy Efficiency Improvement Given the high-energy demand of the methanation process, improving energy efficiency is crucial.

Solution:

1. Catalyst Enhancement: Develop high-efficiency catalysts to improve reaction rates and selectivity.

2. Optimization of Reaction Conditions: Optimize conditions such as temperature, pressure, and reaction time to enhance energy efficiency.

3. Heat Recovery and Process Integration: Implement methods for recovering heat generated during the process, minimizing energy wastage.

Addressing these challenges and exploring solutions holds the potential for methanation technology to contribute to sustainable energy supply and decarbonization. Scientific research and technological development are key to overcoming these challenges.

END

Development of a Terawatt-Level Power Generation System and Comparative Analysis of Power Generation Methods

 

1. What is the single power generation method with a capacity exceeding one terawatt?

XYRONIX, based in Pasadena, California, has been dedicated to the research and development of a single power generation method capable of producing power exceeding the petawatt (1,000 terawatts) range. Today, we officially announce 'the CHEGPG system,' a closed-cycle heat exchange power generation system equipped with petawatt-class power generation capacity exceeding one terawatt, making it the world's first of its kind.

Traditional power generation methods such as thermal, wind, nuclear, and renewable energy sources are limited in their ability to supply electrical power, typically capped at several tens of megawatts, even when multiple facilities or various generation methods are combined. To date, no single power generation method has achieved terawatt-level power supply capabilities. the CHEGPG system, a closed-cycle heat exchange power generation system equipped with binary engines, is the only means to establish a large-scale energy system capable of providing stable and sustained terawatt to petawatt-level electrical power supply 24 hours a day.

 

2. Power Generation Method with Terawatt-Level Capacity: the CHEGPG system

2.1 Megawatt-Level Power Generation Methods:

a. Nuclear Power: Nuclear power is a high-output generation method, with a single nuclear reactor capable of producing approximately 1 gigawatt of power. However, achieving power generation exceeding 1,000 terawatts solely through nuclear power is technically challenging. It typically remains in the 1 to 10 gigawatt range. Moreover, the issues of decommissioning, disposal of spent nuclear fuel, nuclear contamination, and radioactive waste disposal are significant challenges, making it unlikely that the number of nuclear power plants will significantly increase in the future, even if certified as a renewable energy source by the EU.

 

b. Solar Power: Solar power has the potential to generate large-scale power, on the order of 10 megawatts, by installing solar panels over a wide area. However, achieving terawatt-class power generation using solar power requires the construction of large-scale energy systems combining multiple power plants, necessitating vast areas of land, often resulting in environmental destruction, and requiring significant investments in energy storage facilities to ensure stability. Realistically, achieving terawatt-class energy systems through solar power is challenging.

 

c. Wind Power: The cumulative installed capacity of wind power in Japan was 4,581 megawatts (approximately 4.6 gigawatts) as of the end of 2021. While combining multiple wind turbines in offshore wind farms can achieve significant power capacity, it is practically impossible to reach 1,000 terawatts or more, even with such methods. Wind power also requires extensive land or suitable offshore locations, which are limited in availability.

 

d. Hydropower: The only power generation method with the potential to provide over 1,000 terawatts per unit is hydropower, achieved by combining large-scale hydropower plants. However, this method has geographical limitations, and it is practically impossible to combine a sufficient number of large hydropower plants.

 

e. Geothermal Power: Geothermal power harnesses the heat generated by Earth's core and is considered a renewable energy source. It offers stable power generation regardless of weather conditions or time of day. While it has the potential to provide significant power capacity, it also faces challenges such as exploration costs, reduced geothermal resource availability, opposition from local communities and the tourism industry, high initial costs, and susceptibility to natural disasters.

 

2.2 Advancements in Power Generation and the Quest for Energy Security

Power Reception at the Terawatt Scale:

While wet-type geothermal power generation using hot water and steam offers the potential for large-scale power supply in specific regions, the limited availability of geothermal resources in thermal spring areas, as well as concerns about underground water depletion, land subsidence, earthquakes, and strong opposition from local stakeholders, make it practically impossible to achieve over 1,000 terawatts of power capacity with a single geothermal power generation method.

 

a. In conventional power generation methods, it has been practically challenging to achieve stable and sustained power supply exceeding 1,000 terawatts (1 terawatt = 1 trillion watts) by combining multiple power generation methods per unit (single generation method). Achieving stable and sustained power supply exceeding 1,000 terawatts requires the integration of different energy sources (such as nuclear, wind, solar, etc.) and the establishment of an international energy network, which is virtually impossible. Furthermore, achieving stable and sustained power supply at this scale necessitates energy decentralization and efficient power transmission. However, significant transmission losses and environmental impacts make achieving stable and sustained power supply exceeding 1,000 terawatts difficult, even when combining different energy sources.

 

b. Realistic power generation methods such as thermal, renewable energy (solar, wind), nuclear, and hydropower methods face significant challenges in providing terawatt-level power capacity, often requiring the combination of multiple facilities.

 

c. Bioreactor having the potential to generate several gigawatts of power. However, constructing and operating nuclear reactors with power capacity exceeding 1 terawatt is not a common practice. To achieve terawatt-level power generation through nuclear power, numerous nuclear reactors would need to be constructed and integrated, which is practically impossible.

 

d. Other power generation methods based on renewable energy sources (solar, wind, etc.) or fossil fuels (coal, heavy oil, LNG, etc.) can provide gigawatt-class power capacity but typically require the combination of multiple facilities to achieve gigawatt-scale energy supply.

 

2.3 Energy Security:

a. Power generation methods relying on fossil fuels (coal, heavy oil, LNG, etc.), which inevitably depend on near 100% foreign imports, are distinct from AERI's closed-cycle heat exchange power generation system, the CHEGPG system, which utilizes domestically produced energy sources. Unlike the CHEGPG system, which is capable of achieving near-complete energy self-sufficiency within Japan, power generation methods relying on fossil fuels require energy sourcing from overseas. Ensuring a permanent, sustainable, and internationally accessible energy infrastructure becomes imperative. This poses a significant threat to Japan's energy security, especially when considering the imminent challenges related to energy depletion and competition in an environmentally conscious world.

 

b. Renewable energy-based power generation methods (such as solar and wind) face challenges not only due to their unstable output (Issue 1) but also in addressing instantaneous peak power demand (Issue 2). Integrating diverse energy sources may be a potential solution to Issues 1 and 2, but even with integration, it remains uncertain whether their unstable output can be effectively resolved.

 

c. Furthermore, the closed-cycle heat exchange power generation system, the CHEGPG system, stands apart as it can be established almost anywhere within Japan's territory, unrestricted by thermal spring areas or hot water sources. It can independently provide 1,000-terawatt-class enormous electrical power continuously and stably for 24 hours to the region, using self-sustaining geothermal energy. This remarkable capability distinguishes it as the only technically feasible solution to meet the terawatt-level power demands and addresses energy security concerns.

 

3.  Estimating Power Shortages Resulting from the Proliferation of Electric Vehicles

3.1 Statement by Toyoda:

Akio Toyoda, President of the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, stated in a December 2020 press conference that he had conducted calculations regarding the implications of a complete transition to electric vehicles (EVs). He mentioned that if all annual passenger vehicle sales in Japan (approximately 4 million units) were to become EVs, and the entire vehicle fleet (currently at around 62 million units) transitioned to EVs, it would require a 10-15% increase in power generation capacity during peak demand compared to the current levels. Toyoda further noted that this capacity increase would be equivalent to approximately 10 nuclear power plants or around 20 thermal power plants.

 

Additionally, Toyoda's calculations revealed the need for significant infrastructure investments, ranging from 14 to 37 trillion yen, to support the charging facilities required for widespread EV adoption. Furthermore, the supply capacity of batteries for EVs would need to increase approximately 30-fold compared to current levels, with an estimated investment of around 2 trillion yen. The power required to charge EVs upon completion would be equivalent to one week's worth of household consumption.

 

3.2 Verification:

a. The output of Tokyo Electric Power Company's Kashiwazaki Nuclear Power Plant ranges from 1.1 to 1.356 million kilowatts (kW) per unit (boiling water-type light-water reactor at 1.1 million kW, improved boiling water-type light-water reactor at 1.356 million kW). The output per unit of Kansai Electric Power Company's Oi Nuclear Power Plant is 1.18 million kW. While these are representative examples within Japan, the output of existing nuclear power plants can generally be estimated at around 1.1 million kW per unit. With ten such plants, the total power generation capacity would reach 11 million kW.

 

b. Daily electricity consumption in Japan reached its peak in 2001 and has since shown a slight decrease trend. In January 2022, it stood at 151 million kW, with 10% of this amount being 15 million kW over a 24-hour period, closely aligning with Toyoda's statement regarding "10-15% of existing nuclear power."

 

c. Assuming a standard EV battery capacity of 40 kWh (as exemplified by the Nissan Leaf), calculations based on the increase in power generation capacity (equivalent to 11 million kW) indicate that it would be possible to charge 275,000 EVs to full capacity. This represents only 0.4% of the current domestic EV fleet of 62 million units.

 

d. If 10% of the 6,200 units (620,000 units) charge daily, it would require 248 million kW (2,480,000 kW). Given that 1 gigawatt equals 1 billion watts, this amounts to 0.248 GW. To enable 10% of all EVs to charge simultaneously, 23 nuclear power plants (0.248 GW) would be needed. For 50% of all EVs to charge, 113 nuclear power plants (1.24 GW) would be required. To accommodate 80% of all EVs charging, 180 nuclear power plants (1.984 GW) would be necessary. Finally, to support the charging of all 100% of EVs, 230 nuclear power plants (2.48 GW) would be needed.

 

e. As previously discussed, fulfilling the potential for gigawatt-class power generation while ensuring safety, stability, and sustainability remains a challenge for various power generation methods. This includes nuclear power, which faces unresolved issues related to decommissioning, disposal of spent nuclear fuel, radioactive contamination, and ocean disposal. Additionally, renewable energy sources like solar power require vast land areas, and wind power depends on specific geographical conditions, making large-scale implementation difficult.

 

Considering the factors mentioned above, it becomes evident that the only solution capable of addressing the critical issues of (1) energy security, (2) climate change mitigation, (3) achieving carbon neutrality, and (4) zero CO2 emissions, all at once, is the Closed Heat Exchange Generator with Pyroelectric Generator (CHEGPG) system, which possesses a power generation capacity of 1,000 terawatts (1 terawatt = 1 trillion watts = 1,000 MW) per unit, providing a comprehensive and unparalleled solution.

 

END

1. carbon-neutral carbon recycling system: AERI Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process (Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology)

・XYRONIX, has set ambitious goals in pursuit of achieving carbon neutrality by 2060 while peaking carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 2030. AERI acknowledges the limitations of electric vehicles (EVs) in achieving this goal and asserts that hybrid vehicles are more advantageous than EVs. Furthermore, AERI advocates for the use of synthetic fuels (such as LPG, LNG, and methanol) as green fuels in hybrid vehicles, considering them the most environmentally friendly option among green fuel vehicles.

 

To accomplish these objectives, XYRONIX is actively engaged in research and development of the carbon-neutral carbon recycling system: XYRONIX Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process (Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology).

 

・In 2003, XYRONIX introduced the carbon-neutral carbon recycling system: XYRONIX Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process (Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology) as a method for producing new green fuels (synthetic fuels) such as green methanol, green LPG, and green LNG. These fuels were being considered as potential replacements for gasoline (fossil fuels) and were part of XYRONIX's efforts to explore models of green fuel vehicles that could serve as alternatives to electric vehicles.

 

・On September 16, 2022, XYRONIX announced the successful completion of fundamental research on the carbon-neutral carbon recycling system: XYRONIX Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process (Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology). This milestone marks a significant step forward in XYRONIX's efforts to accelerate the adoption of methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) and the associated green methanol production technology.

 

・Methanol, commonly known as 'wood alcohol,' is a straightforward organic compound that can be produced from various raw materials, including coal, natural gas, biomass, and captured carbon dioxide. Its advantages as a fuel are evident. Methanol boasts comparable power to traditional fuels while being more environmentally friendly. For instance, methanol is already widely employed in the world of racing cars due to its dual benefits of efficient engine cooling and increased horsepower. Depending on the specific use case, such as long-distance transportation, methanol-powered vehicles could emerge as a cost-effective and reliable alternative to electric vehicles.

・According to Professor Kazuto Kamuro, the Chief Researcher at the XYRONIX and a Quantum Physicist and Brain Scientist holding both a Doctorate in Science and a Doctorate in Engineering, "Methanol engines can achieve efficiency equivalent to that of diesel engines without causing the same exhaust-related issues." Professor Kamuro has been conducting research on the potential use of methanol in transportation and logistics within the United States.

・For the past decade, from 2003 onwards, XYRONIX has been intensively engaged in research and development efforts focused on green methanol fuel (green synthetic fuel) as a means to transition the gasoline automobile industry toward a future characterized by lower pollution and reduced reliance on fossil fuels (such as gasoline). They have conducted experimental operations with methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) as part of this endeavor.

 

2. Trends in Methanol Utilization Experiments in China

・Currently, China is demonstrating a more serious commitment to alternative fuels. This is further evidenced by the government's recent actions, in addition to drafting standards for methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) and supporting related industries, building upon their efforts from the previous year. As Chinese automakers seek new innovations to revolutionize the industry, methanol has finally started to garner public attention. Like electric vehicles, it holds the potential not only for commercial success but also for politically enhancing China's ambitions in climate tech.

 

・As of September 2022, China stands as the global leader in methanol production, manufacturing approximately 60% of the world's methanol and consuming it domestically. Historically, the majority of this production has been utilized in plastic manufacturing.

 

・China initiated experiments with methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) in 2012. They encouraged automobile manufacturers to develop models for use in several cities and collected data on the economic and environmental impacts of methanol vehicles over the next six years.

 

・Subsequently, methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) were found to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 26% while increasing energy efficiency by 21% compared to gasoline vehicles. Following these trial phases, the Chinese government announced policies in 2019, pledging support for methanol fuel, particularly for public transportation, taxis, and government vehicles.

 

・XYRONIX's Chief Researcher, Professor Kazuto Kamuro, believes that methanol is also an attractive choice as a fuel for large, long-distance transport vehicles such as trucks. Currently, electric trucks are significantly more expensive than conventional fossil fuel trucks (gasoline or diesel trucks) due to the need for large batteries. However, methanol trucks use similar engines to conventional trucks (fossil fuel trucks), allowing them to be purchased at nearly the same cost as fossil fuel trucks.

 

・Professor Kazuto Kamuro, an adjunct professor at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) and the Director of Research at the XYRONIX, has pointed out that 'The majority of trucks operating on Chinese roads for parcel deliveries are individually owned by truck drivers. If trucks become too expensive, they may no longer be able to afford them. If making a livelihood becomes difficult, truck drivers may have no capacity to consider achieving carbon neutrality.' He emphasizes the importance of ensuring affordability for truck drivers in the context of carbon-neutral efforts.

 

・Nevertheless, the development of methanol passenger cars (green fuel vehicles) in China has been progressing at a significantly slower pace compared to other environmentally friendly options like electric vehicles. Over the course of a decade, the number of electric vehicles in China has surged from 20,000 units to over 10 million. In contrast, the count of methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) has merely increased from zero to a modest 30,000 units.

 

・Furthermore, the number of methanol refueling stations in China is currently below 200, and all of them are concentrated within the provinces where the trial programs were conducted. In essence, methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) can only be operated within these provinces or their cities. The future construction of methanol refueling stations is likely to depend on the support from China's two major gasoline station operators, Sinopec and China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC). These two companies collectively manage more than half of the country's domestic gasoline stations, but as of now, neither of them has shown significant interest in the methanol business.

 

・According to Professor Kazuto Kamuro, the Chief Researcher at XYRONIX, 'Methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) are not included in the category of "new energy vehicles" that China heavily subsidizes, which is a major reason for the development lag. In the early 2000s, China drafted regulations for new energy vehicles, but they initially only encompassed vehicles powered solely by electricity, such as pure electric vehicles, plug-in hybrids, and fuel cell vehicles. Methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles), which are closer in resemblance to traditional gasoline vehicles, were not included, causing them to miss out on two decades of rapid growth.'

 

・So, as of today, methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) remain more of a regional experiment rather than a practical choice for Chinese consumers. However, an increasing number of local governments are now offering subsidies of around $700 to both buyers of methanol vehicles. Gasoline stations have also received funding, up to $3,000, for modifications to enable the provision of methanol fuel. Additionally, Geely, a leading Chinese automaker that owns Volvo Cars, began developing methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) in 2005 and has launched several new models this year.

・Geely states that the adoption and proliferation of methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) represent the most realistic and effective path toward the development of a healthy and sustainable transportation system. They claim to have produced over 90% of the methanol vehicles currently in use in China. Geely's methanol passenger cars (green fuel vehicles) have collectively traveled over 10 billion kilometers, resulting in a reduction of approximately 19,400 tons of carbon dioxide emissions that would have been produced by an equivalent number of gasoline vehicles.

 

3. The Impact of Methanol Vehicles (green fuel vehicles) on China's Carbon Neutrality Goals

・In 2020, the announcement of a carbon-neutral commitment by President Xi Jinping during the United Nations General Assembly marked a significant shift in perspective regarding methanol. According to Professor Kamuro, the Director of XYRONIX, “China's overarching development goals for carbon neutrality have since created substantial opportunities. It appears that people have suddenly recognized methanol as a genuinely carbon-neutral fuel.”

・Traditional methanol has historically been produced from fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas. However, it can also be produced from renewable resources like agricultural waste. On September 16, 2022, the XYRONIX achieved a breakthrough in research and development by utilizing a carbon-neutral, carbon recycling system known as the CHEGPG system, which involves the circulation and recovery of CO2 from the atmosphere. This innovative process enables the production of new green fuels (synthetic fuels) to replace gasoline (fossil fuel). These green fuels include green methanol, green LPG, green LNG, and others. This development signifies a significant advancement in Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology.

・This, at least theoretically, signifies the possibility of manufacturing automobile fuel through carbon-negative methods. The same applies to other chemical products derived from methanol.

Currently, one of the major companies involved in producing methanol from carbon dioxide is Carbon Recycling International (CRI) in Iceland. Geely invested in CRI in 2015 and partnered to build the world's largest facility for manufacturing fuel from CO2 in China. With this facility in operation, it can recycle 160,000 tons of CO2 annually, emitted from a steel mill.

・What makes green fuels (synthetic fuels) like green methanol, green LPG, green LNG, and others desirable is their ability to be cleanly produced using carbon-neutral, carbon recycling system-based XYRONIX Synthetic Fuel Chemical Processes. These processes utilize CO2 captured from the atmosphere as a raw material. The technology for generating synthetic fuels that can remove CO2 already emitted into the atmosphere is indeed remarkable and deserves special attention.

・To achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, it may not be wise to dismiss green fuel vehicles in favor of electric vehicles as if they were in competition. Instead, promoting the use of green methanol fuel and the widespread adoption of the carbon-neutral, carbon recycling system-based XYRONIX Synthetic Fuel Chemical Processes (Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology) could potentially help us reach the 2060 carbon neutrality target.

 

4. Transition from Chinese Dirty Methanol to AERI green methanol (Synthetic Fuel)

・the carbon-neutral carbon recycling system-based XYRONIX Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process (Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology) is green throughout the entire manufacturing process. In contrast, the majority of methanol production in China is currently reliant on burning coal. In fact, one of the primary motivations for China's initial pursuit of methanol was the ability to use coal instead of low domestic oil production to power automobiles. Presently, leading provinces in China conducting experiments with methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) also happen to have abundant coal resources.

・

As pointed out by Professor Kazuto Kamuro, who serves as the Chief Researcher at XYRONIX and is also a professor at the California Institute of Technology (CALTECH), methanol holds potential as a green fuel, unlike gasoline or diesel. However, a significant issue lies in the fact that most electric vehicles in China, which cannot currently utilize the carbon-neutral carbon recycling system-based XYRONIX Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process (Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology), are still powered by electricity generated from coal. The current production process of methanol in China, relying on coal, also retains the potential to emit substantial amounts of carbon dioxide, making it a "dirty" source of fuel.

To address this challenge, it is imperative to cease the production of "dirty" methanol derived from coal as well as transition to green methanol production using the carbon-neutral carbon recycling system-based XYRONIX Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process. This transition should be coupled with the adoption of clean energy sources, renewable energy sources, and a carbon-neutral, carbon recycling system-based CHEGPG system electricity, along with the recovery of CO2 from the atmosphere. These measures will facilitate the shift towards carbon-neutral green methanol production.

・Furthermore, Professor Kazuto Kamuro added, "If there is no intention to pursue low-carbon methanol, then there should be no attempt to incorporate methanol."

・Methanol fuel also has other potential drawbacks, such as its lower energy density compared to gasoline and diesel. Consequently, it requires larger and heavier fuel tanks or more frequent refueling by the driver. This limitation is one of the key reasons why methanol's use as aviation fuel is hindered.

・Countries like Germany and Denmark, in addition to China, have been considering the potential of methanol fuel. However, China has been at least one step ahead of other nations in this regard. Nevertheless, it remains a significant question whether China will replicate its success in electric vehicle development or follow a different path, like other countries with major automotive industries.

・"In 1982, the state of California provided grants to automakers to produce over 900 methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) as part of an experimental program. The Reagan administration even pushed for the Alternative Motor Fuels Act to promote the use of methanol. However, a lack of widespread support and a decline in gasoline prices hindered further research into methanol fuel. While the drivers participating in the trials were generally satisfied with the performance of the vehicles, they expressed dissatisfaction with the difficulty of obtaining methanol fuel and its limited availability compared to gasoline cars. It's regrettable that California officially discontinued the use of methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) in 2005, and since then, such experiments have not been carried out in the United States," concluded Professor Kazuto Kamuro, the Director of Research at XYRONIX and a professor at the California Institute of Technology (CALTECH).

 

5. XYRONIX has achieved success in the research and development of three GX (Green Transformation) technologies:

 

a. A clean and renewable energy source that relies 100% on domestically produced geothermal energy, resulting in zero greenhouse gas emissions (greenhouse gas emissions zero). This geothermal power generation method is completely independent of imported coal or crude oil. It possesses the capability to generate terawatt-class power, meeting 100% of the country's electricity demand. It can consistently produce ultra-low-cost electricity ranging from 1 yen/kWh to 0.01 yen/kWh, 24/7, 365 days a year, in a stable and sustainable manner, utilizing the 1 yen/kWh to 0.01 yen/kWh ultra-low-cost, carbon-neutral, and infinite energy source known as CHEGPG (generation method).

 

b. A carbon-neutral AERI Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process that uses 100% domestically produced and consumed raw materials, independent of imported coal or crude oil. This process involves the recovery of carbon dioxide using a carbon recycling system and is used to produce synthetic fuels such as LNG, LPG, and methanol.

 

c. A fossil fuel alternative, green synthetic fuel (green methanol, green green LNG, LPG), production technology that utilizes an infinite and stable supply of power from the CHEGPG system power source. This power source relies on 100% domestically produced and consumed geothermal energy, achieving 100% renewable energy for electricity. It represents an endless source of fossil fuel replacement fuel.

 

These three GX (Green Transformation) technologies mark significant achievements in the field of sustainable and environmentally friendly energy production.

 

6. For the reasons mentioned above, it is believed that XYRONIX CPRPORATION, which is actively advancing research and development in the field of (1) carbon-neutral, carbon recycling system-based AERI Synthetic Fuel Chemical Processes that utilize the power generated by the carbon-neutral, infinite energy source known as CHEGPG system, along with the recovery of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, to produce green methanol, green LPG, and green LNG, can be considered as a leading group that can guarantee our country's energy security.

 

7. In addition to the reasons mentioned above, the combination of (1) ensuring energy security, (2) mitigating climate change and addressing global warming, (3) embracing Green Transformation (GX), (4) achieving carbon neutrality, (5) zero emissions of greenhouse gases like CO2, (6) creating and nurturing green giants in the power generation sector, and (7) establishing and nurturing industries based on emissions trading through carbon pricing—all of which present critical challenges for transitioning to a new industrial structure where our country has yet to find a solution—can be addressed comprehensively by the integration of three composite technologies:

 

a. the CHEGPG system, a closed-cycle heat exchange power generation system equipped with thermal regeneration turbines, capable of generating 1,000 terawatts per unit (1 terawatt = 1 trillion watts = 1,000 MW) of power.

 

b. The carbon-neutral AERI Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process.

 

c. Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology (green methanol, green LPG, and green LNG).

 

This integrated approach offers a promising solution to the pressing challenges facing our country in transitioning to a new industrial structure(green new deal).

 

END

1. carbon-neutral carbon recycling system: AERI Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process (Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology)

・XYRONIX, has set ambitious goals in pursuit of achieving carbon neutrality by 2060 while peaking carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 2030. AERI acknowledges the limitations of electric vehicles (EVs) in achieving this goal and asserts that hybrid vehicles are more advantageous than EVs. Furthermore, AERI advocates for the use of synthetic fuels (such as LPG, LNG, and methanol) as green fuels in hybrid vehicles, considering them the most environmentally friendly option among green fuel vehicles.

 

To accomplish these objectives, XYRONIX is actively engaged in research and development of the carbon-neutral carbon recycling system: XYRONIX Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process (Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology).

 

・In 2003, XYRONIX introduced the carbon-neutral carbon recycling system: XYRONIX Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process (Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology) as a method for producing new green fuels (synthetic fuels) such as green methanol, green LPG, and green LNG. These fuels were being considered as potential replacements for gasoline (fossil fuels) and were part of XYRONIX's efforts to explore models of green fuel vehicles that could serve as alternatives to electric vehicles.

 

・On September 16, 2022, XYRONIX announced the successful completion of fundamental research on the carbon-neutral carbon recycling system: XYRONIX Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process (Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology). This milestone marks a significant step forward in XYRONIX's efforts to accelerate the adoption of methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) and the associated green methanol production technology.

 

・Methanol, commonly known as 'wood alcohol,' is a straightforward organic compound that can be produced from various raw materials, including coal, natural gas, biomass, and captured carbon dioxide. Its advantages as a fuel are evident. Methanol boasts comparable power to traditional fuels while being more environmentally friendly. For instance, methanol is already widely employed in the world of racing cars due to its dual benefits of efficient engine cooling and increased horsepower. Depending on the specific use case, such as long-distance transportation, methanol-powered vehicles could emerge as a cost-effective and reliable alternative to electric vehicles.

・According to Professor Kazuto Kamuro, the Chief Researcher at the XYRONIX and a Quantum Physicist and Brain Scientist holding both a Doctorate in Science and a Doctorate in Engineering, "Methanol engines can achieve efficiency equivalent to that of diesel engines without causing the same exhaust-related issues." Professor Kamuro has been conducting research on the potential use of methanol in transportation and logistics within the United States.

・For the past decade, from 2003 onwards, XYRONIX has been intensively engaged in research and development efforts focused on green methanol fuel (green synthetic fuel) as a means to transition the gasoline automobile industry toward a future characterized by lower pollution and reduced reliance on fossil fuels (such as gasoline). They have conducted experimental operations with methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) as part of this endeavor.

 

2. Trends in Methanol Utilization Experiments in China

・Currently, China is demonstrating a more serious commitment to alternative fuels. This is further evidenced by the government's recent actions, in addition to drafting standards for methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) and supporting related industries, building upon their efforts from the previous year. As Chinese automakers seek new innovations to revolutionize the industry, methanol has finally started to garner public attention. Like electric vehicles, it holds the potential not only for commercial success but also for politically enhancing China's ambitions in climate tech.

 

・As of September 2022, China stands as the global leader in methanol production, manufacturing approximately 60% of the world's methanol and consuming it domestically. Historically, the majority of this production has been utilized in plastic manufacturing.

 

・China initiated experiments with methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) in 2012. They encouraged automobile manufacturers to develop models for use in several cities and collected data on the economic and environmental impacts of methanol vehicles over the next six years.

 

・Subsequently, methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) were found to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 26% while increasing energy efficiency by 21% compared to gasoline vehicles. Following these trial phases, the Chinese government announced policies in 2019, pledging support for methanol fuel, particularly for public transportation, taxis, and government vehicles.

 

・XYRONIX's Chief Researcher, Professor Kazuto Kamuro, believes that methanol is also an attractive choice as a fuel for large, long-distance transport vehicles such as trucks. Currently, electric trucks are significantly more expensive than conventional fossil fuel trucks (gasoline or diesel trucks) due to the need for large batteries. However, methanol trucks use similar engines to conventional trucks (fossil fuel trucks), allowing them to be purchased at nearly the same cost as fossil fuel trucks.

 

・Professor Kazuto Kamuro, an adjunct professor at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) and the Director of Research at the XYRONIX, has pointed out that 'The majority of trucks operating on Chinese roads for parcel deliveries are individually owned by truck drivers. If trucks become too expensive, they may no longer be able to afford them. If making a livelihood becomes difficult, truck drivers may have no capacity to consider achieving carbon neutrality.' He emphasizes the importance of ensuring affordability for truck drivers in the context of carbon-neutral efforts.

 

・Nevertheless, the development of methanol passenger cars (green fuel vehicles) in China has been progressing at a significantly slower pace compared to other environmentally friendly options like electric vehicles. Over the course of a decade, the number of electric vehicles in China has surged from 20,000 units to over 10 million. In contrast, the count of methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) has merely increased from zero to a modest 30,000 units.

 

・Furthermore, the number of methanol refueling stations in China is currently below 200, and all of them are concentrated within the provinces where the trial programs were conducted. In essence, methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) can only be operated within these provinces or their cities. The future construction of methanol refueling stations is likely to depend on the support from China's two major gasoline station operators, Sinopec and China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC). These two companies collectively manage more than half of the country's domestic gasoline stations, but as of now, neither of them has shown significant interest in the methanol business.

 

・According to Professor Kazuto Kamuro, the Chief Researcher at XYRONIX, 'Methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) are not included in the category of "new energy vehicles" that China heavily subsidizes, which is a major reason for the development lag. In the early 2000s, China drafted regulations for new energy vehicles, but they initially only encompassed vehicles powered solely by electricity, such as pure electric vehicles, plug-in hybrids, and fuel cell vehicles. Methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles), which are closer in resemblance to traditional gasoline vehicles, were not included, causing them to miss out on two decades of rapid growth.'

 

・So, as of today, methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) remain more of a regional experiment rather than a practical choice for Chinese consumers. However, an increasing number of local governments are now offering subsidies of around $700 to both buyers of methanol vehicles. Gasoline stations have also received funding, up to $3,000, for modifications to enable the provision of methanol fuel. Additionally, Geely, a leading Chinese automaker that owns Volvo Cars, began developing methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) in 2005 and has launched several new models this year.

・Geely states that the adoption and proliferation of methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) represent the most realistic and effective path toward the development of a healthy and sustainable transportation system. They claim to have produced over 90% of the methanol vehicles currently in use in China. Geely's methanol passenger cars (green fuel vehicles) have collectively traveled over 10 billion kilometers, resulting in a reduction of approximately 19,400 tons of carbon dioxide emissions that would have been produced by an equivalent number of gasoline vehicles.

 

3. The Impact of Methanol Vehicles (green fuel vehicles) on China's Carbon Neutrality Goals

・In 2020, the announcement of a carbon-neutral commitment by President Xi Jinping during the United Nations General Assembly marked a significant shift in perspective regarding methanol. According to Professor Kamuro, the Director of XYRONIX, “China's overarching development goals for carbon neutrality have since created substantial opportunities. It appears that people have suddenly recognized methanol as a genuinely carbon-neutral fuel.”

・Traditional methanol has historically been produced from fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas. However, it can also be produced from renewable resources like agricultural waste. On September 16, 2022, the XYRONIX achieved a breakthrough in research and development by utilizing a carbon-neutral, carbon recycling system known as the CHEGPG system, which involves the circulation and recovery of CO2 from the atmosphere. This innovative process enables the production of new green fuels (synthetic fuels) to replace gasoline (fossil fuel). These green fuels include green methanol, green LPG, green LNG, and others. This development signifies a significant advancement in Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology.

・This, at least theoretically, signifies the possibility of manufacturing automobile fuel through carbon-negative methods. The same applies to other chemical products derived from methanol.

Currently, one of the major companies involved in producing methanol from carbon dioxide is Carbon Recycling International (CRI) in Iceland. Geely invested in CRI in 2015 and partnered to build the world's largest facility for manufacturing fuel from CO2 in China. With this facility in operation, it can recycle 160,000 tons of CO2 annually, emitted from a steel mill.

・What makes green fuels (synthetic fuels) like green methanol, green LPG, green LNG, and others desirable is their ability to be cleanly produced using carbon-neutral, carbon recycling system-based XYRONIX Synthetic Fuel Chemical Processes. These processes utilize CO2 captured from the atmosphere as a raw material. The technology for generating synthetic fuels that can remove CO2 already emitted into the atmosphere is indeed remarkable and deserves special attention.

・To achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, it may not be wise to dismiss green fuel vehicles in favor of electric vehicles as if they were in competition. Instead, promoting the use of green methanol fuel and the widespread adoption of the carbon-neutral, carbon recycling system-based XYRONIX Synthetic Fuel Chemical Processes (Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology) could potentially help us reach the 2060 carbon neutrality target.

 

4. Transition from Chinese Dirty Methanol to AERI green methanol (Synthetic Fuel)

・the carbon-neutral carbon recycling system-based XYRONIX Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process (Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology) is green throughout the entire manufacturing process. In contrast, the majority of methanol production in China is currently reliant on burning coal. In fact, one of the primary motivations for China's initial pursuit of methanol was the ability to use coal instead of low domestic oil production to power automobiles. Presently, leading provinces in China conducting experiments with methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) also happen to have abundant coal resources.

・

As pointed out by Professor Kazuto Kamuro, who serves as the Chief Researcher at XYRONIX and is also a professor at the California Institute of Technology (CALTECH), methanol holds potential as a green fuel, unlike gasoline or diesel. However, a significant issue lies in the fact that most electric vehicles in China, which cannot currently utilize the carbon-neutral carbon recycling system-based XYRONIX Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process (Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology), are still powered by electricity generated from coal. The current production process of methanol in China, relying on coal, also retains the potential to emit substantial amounts of carbon dioxide, making it a "dirty" source of fuel.

To address this challenge, it is imperative to cease the production of "dirty" methanol derived from coal as well as transition to green methanol production using the carbon-neutral carbon recycling system-based XYRONIX Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process. This transition should be coupled with the adoption of clean energy sources, renewable energy sources, and a carbon-neutral, carbon recycling system-based CHEGPG system electricity, along with the recovery of CO2 from the atmosphere. These measures will facilitate the shift towards carbon-neutral green methanol production.

・Furthermore, Professor Kazuto Kamuro added, "If there is no intention to pursue low-carbon methanol, then there should be no attempt to incorporate methanol."

・Methanol fuel also has other potential drawbacks, such as its lower energy density compared to gasoline and diesel. Consequently, it requires larger and heavier fuel tanks or more frequent refueling by the driver. This limitation is one of the key reasons why methanol's use as aviation fuel is hindered.

・Countries like Germany and Denmark, in addition to China, have been considering the potential of methanol fuel. However, China has been at least one step ahead of other nations in this regard. Nevertheless, it remains a significant question whether China will replicate its success in electric vehicle development or follow a different path, like other countries with major automotive industries.

・"In 1982, the state of California provided grants to automakers to produce over 900 methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) as part of an experimental program. The Reagan administration even pushed for the Alternative Motor Fuels Act to promote the use of methanol. However, a lack of widespread support and a decline in gasoline prices hindered further research into methanol fuel. While the drivers participating in the trials were generally satisfied with the performance of the vehicles, they expressed dissatisfaction with the difficulty of obtaining methanol fuel and its limited availability compared to gasoline cars. It's regrettable that California officially discontinued the use of methanol vehicles (green fuel vehicles) in 2005, and since then, such experiments have not been carried out in the United States," concluded Professor Kazuto Kamuro, the Director of Research at XYRONIX and a professor at the California Institute of Technology (CALTECH).

 

5. XYRONIX has achieved success in the research and development of three GX (Green Transformation) technologies:

 

a. A clean and renewable energy source that relies 100% on domestically produced geothermal energy, resulting in zero greenhouse gas emissions (greenhouse gas emissions zero). This geothermal power generation method is completely independent of imported coal or crude oil. It possesses the capability to generate terawatt-class power, meeting 100% of the country's electricity demand. It can consistently produce ultra-low-cost electricity ranging from 1 yen/kWh to 0.01 yen/kWh, 24/7, 365 days a year, in a stable and sustainable manner, utilizing the 1 yen/kWh to 0.01 yen/kWh ultra-low-cost, carbon-neutral, and infinite energy source known as CHEGPG (generation method).

 

b. A carbon-neutral AERI Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process that uses 100% domestically produced and consumed raw materials, independent of imported coal or crude oil. This process involves the recovery of carbon dioxide using a carbon recycling system and is used to produce synthetic fuels such as LNG, LPG, and methanol.

 

c. A fossil fuel alternative, green synthetic fuel (green methanol, green green LNG, LPG), production technology that utilizes an infinite and stable supply of power from the CHEGPG system power source. This power source relies on 100% domestically produced and consumed geothermal energy, achieving 100% renewable energy for electricity. It represents an endless source of fossil fuel replacement fuel.

 

These three GX (Green Transformation) technologies mark significant achievements in the field of sustainable and environmentally friendly energy production.

 

6. For the reasons mentioned above, it is believed that XYRONIX CPRPORATION, which is actively advancing research and development in the field of (1) carbon-neutral, carbon recycling system-based AERI Synthetic Fuel Chemical Processes that utilize the power generated by the carbon-neutral, infinite energy source known as CHEGPG system, along with the recovery of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, to produce green methanol, green LPG, and green LNG, can be considered as a leading group that can guarantee our country's energy security.

 

7. In addition to the reasons mentioned above, the combination of (1) ensuring energy security, (2) mitigating climate change and addressing global warming, (3) embracing Green Transformation (GX), (4) achieving carbon neutrality, (5) zero emissions of greenhouse gases like CO2, (6) creating and nurturing green giants in the power generation sector, and (7) establishing and nurturing industries based on emissions trading through carbon pricing—all of which present critical challenges for transitioning to a new industrial structure where our country has yet to find a solution—can be addressed comprehensively by the integration of three composite technologies:

 

a. the CHEGPG system, a closed-cycle heat exchange power generation system equipped with thermal regeneration turbines, capable of generating 1,000 terawatts per unit (1 terawatt = 1 trillion watts = 1,000 MW) of power.

 

b. The carbon-neutral AERI Synthetic Fuel Chemical Process.

 

c. Green Synthetic Fuel Production Technology (green methanol, green LPG, and green LNG).

 

This integrated approach offers a promising solution to the pressing challenges facing our country in transitioning to a new industrial structure(green new deal).

 

END